Authorities in the city have taken into custody 13 individuals on suspected charges of involuntary manslaughter in connection with last week’s devastating fire, amidst growing criticism over the detentions of civilians calling for responsibility.
Emergency services persisted in combing through the seven-building complex of the Wang Fuk Court residential area in the Tai Po district on the start of the week, following the city’s deadliest fire in 75 years. The number of fatalities reached 151 and is anticipated to climb further as the operation goes on. Approximately forty people are still missing.
The housing complex, home to almost 5,000 people, had been in the midst of major refurbishment that have been associated with the origin of the blaze. In the wake of the tragedy, anger has grown over alleged previous safety breaches by the contractor working at the site and lax enforcement of safety codes, spurred on by disclosures that residents had been complaining about the work for a twelve months.
On Monday afternoon, officials said anti-corruption authorities had arrested 13 people over the disaster so far, including the directors and an engineering consultant of a contracting firm, and had “promptly initiated a thorough probe along the lines of manslaughter”.
A top administrator stated that seven of twenty tested samples of the mesh netting used around the towers did not meet flame-resistance requirements. Initial testing had found materials were up to code, but the spokesperson said the less expensive, noncompliant material had been put in areas hard to reach in order to avoid discovery, describing it as a “shameful act”.
“They just wanted to profit at the expense of human lives,” he said.
As accusations of safety violations mount, alongside revelations that government authorities had issued multiple apparently unenforced warnings, residents have questioned why no government figures have yet faced consequences. Instead, two members of the public were reportedly arrested by national security police.
A person, identified as a local student, was detained over an internet appeal that made “four demands” for guaranteed support for the victims and accountability for those at to blame, including any negligent or culpable public servants.
Reports said the individual was detained for “seditious intention”. Law enforcement did not confirm the arrest, saying only that they “will act according to the situation and in compliance with the law”.
Local media also reported the detention of a ex-local representative.
Questioned about the detentions, the security chief said there had been “inaccurate comments online” that were aimed to undermine national security. “Therefore, we must take appropriate measures, including police action,” the official told a press conference. “Operational details cannot be disclosed as they concern national security.”
On Hong Kong social media, people criticised the detention of citizens. “National security must be prioritised even if the dead are still trapped in the building,” said one.
Some commenters drew comparisons to mainland China. “The mainland, such acts are termed ‘picking quarrels and provoking trouble’,” said one commenter. “They are typically met with heavy sentences. Stability trumps everything.”
A different user said: “Now that we are following the mainland’s methods, by targeting the individual who raises the question, no one will dare to ask, and thus the city's administration will have no issues.”
The detentions came after warnings by national security authorities that they would take action against anyone considered to be exploiting the incident to incite “anti-China” sentiment.
Prior to the detentions, authorities had already demonstrated heightened sensitivity to the public reaction. Since the quelling of earlier protests, civilian gatherings have been tightly controlled. In the days following the fire, volunteer supporters quickly organized aid operations, with hundreds of people employing vehicles and public transport to bring in mountains of clothes, food and other necessities for the survivors.
However, by nightfall, armed police were patrolling the vicinity, and public authorities eventually took over from the community coordinators.
The petition over which the student was reportedly detained was launched on Friday evening. Its “four demands” echoed the language of previous campaigns but did not advocate political change.
The student told media that he was only “proposing very basic requests”.
“Should these suggestions are deemed subversive or ‘crossing the line’, then I believe I can’t predict the consequences of any action any more, and I can only do what I truly believe is correct,” he stated.
Web developer and UX designer with a passion for creating efficient grid-based layouts and modern web solutions.